version: desktop | mobile

Dave's Free Press

the Slightly Less Bad And Wrong Blog Edition

 

Recent posts

Less important journals

Search




Subscribe

rss

Journals that link here

Powered by

Bryar 3.0!
geeky silly politics rant weird meta religion music transport london drinking perl culture olympics photography language cooking hacking web sport media rsnapshot holidays books spam film whisky bryar yapc palm telecoms review bastards cars travel etiquette clothes lolcats amazon maths curry security home unix phone go environment bbc latin anglo-saxon privacy linux gps deafness work
Sun, 6 Aug 2006

Congestion vs environment

According to The Observer, MPs are surprised that "while a national road-charging scheme to charge motorists by the mile is being piloted, its aim is to cut congestion, not to discriminate between a higher-emissions Land Rover and an environmentally less damaging Toyota Prius".

You see, that's because road usage is not the best way of determining how much environmental damage a vehicle does. The total pollutant output is, over the lifetime of the vehicle, pretty much proportional to the amount of fuel put in to it. Consequently, while road charging may be a great way to ease congestion (as has been proven in London), if you want to reduce environmental damage, you need to encourage the use of more fuel-efficient vehicles instead. The way to do that is to charge more for fuel and perhaps to subsidise the purchase of efficient vehicles such as the Prius. It is an entirely different problem from congestion, and so is best solved in entirely different ways.

Posted at 22:58:01 by David Cantrell
keywords: environment | politics | transport
Permalink | 0 Comments

Archive

2007

Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan

2006

Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan

2005

Jan Feb Mar Apr
May Jun Jul Aug
Sep Oct Nov Dec
Dec
Nov
Oct
Sep
Aug
Jul
Jun
May
Apr
Mar
Feb
Jan